rename, renameat, renameat2 - change the name or location of a file
Standard C library (libc
, -lc
)
#include <stdio.h>
int rename(const char *oldpath, const char *newpath);
#include <fcntl.h> /* Definition of AT_* constants */
#include <stdio.h>
int renameat(int olddirfd, const char *oldpath,
int newdirfd, const char *newpath);
int renameat2(int olddirfd, const char *oldpath,
int newdirfd, const char *newpath, unsigned int flags);
Feature Test Macro Requirements for glibc (see feature_test_macros(7)):
renameat():
Since glibc 2.10:
_POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 200809L
Before glibc 2.10:
_ATFILE_SOURCE
renameat2():
_GNU_SOURCE
rename() renames a file, moving it between
directories if required. Any other hard links to the file (as created
using link(2)) are unaffected. Open file descriptors
for oldpath
are also unaffected.
Various restrictions determine whether or not the rename operation succeeds: see ERRORS below.
If newpath
already exists, it will be atomically replaced,
so that there is no point at which another process attempting to access
newpath
will find it missing. However, there will probably be a
window in which both oldpath
and newpath
refer to the
file being renamed.
If oldpath
and newpath
are existing hard links
referring to the same file, then rename() does nothing,
and returns a success status.
If newpath
exists but the operation fails for some reason,
rename() guarantees to leave an instance of
newpath
in place.
oldpath
can specify a directory. In this case,
newpath
must either not exist, or it must specify an empty
directory.
If oldpath
refers to a symbolic link, the link is renamed;
if newpath
refers to a symbolic link, the link will be
overwritten.
The renameat() system call operates in exactly the same way as rename(), except for the differences described here.
If the pathname given in oldpath
is relative, then it is
interpreted relative to the directory referred to by the file descriptor
olddirfd
(rather than relative to the current working directory
of the calling process, as is done by rename() for a
relative pathname).
If oldpath
is relative and olddirfd
is the special
value AT_FDCWD, then oldpath
is interpreted
relative to the current working directory of the calling process (like
rename()).
If oldpath
is absolute, then olddirfd
is
ignored.
The interpretation of newpath
is as for oldpath
,
except that a relative pathname is interpreted relative to the directory
referred to by the file descriptor newdirfd
.
See openat(2) for an explanation of the need for renameat().
renameat2() has an additional flags
argument. A renameat2() call with a zero flags
argument is equivalent to renameat().
The flags
argument is a bit mask consisting of zero or more
of the following flags:
Atomically exchange oldpath
and newpath
. Both
pathnames must exist but may be of different types (e.g., one could be a
non-empty directory and the other a symbolic link).
Don't overwrite newpath
of the rename. Return an error if
newpath
already exists.
RENAME_NOREPLACE can't be employed together with RENAME_EXCHANGE.
RENAME_NOREPLACE requires support from the underlying filesystem. Support for various filesystems was added as follows:
ext4 (Linux 3.15);
btrfs, tmpfs, and cifs (Linux 3.17);
xfs (Linux 4.0);
Support for many other filesystems was added in Linux 4.9, including ext2, minix, reiserfs, jfs, vfat, and bpf.
This operation makes sense only for overlay/union filesystem implementations.
Specifying RENAME_WHITEOUT creates a "whiteout" object at the source of the rename at the same time as performing the rename. The whole operation is atomic, so that if the rename succeeds then the whiteout will also have been created.
A "whiteout" is an object that has special meaning in union/overlay filesystem constructs. In these constructs, multiple layers exist and only the top one is ever modified. A whiteout on an upper layer will effectively hide a matching file in the lower layer, making it appear as if the file didn't exist.
When a file that exists on the lower layer is renamed, the file is first copied up (if not already on the upper layer) and then renamed on the upper, read-write layer. At the same time, the source file needs to be "whiteouted" (so that the version of the source file in the lower layer is rendered invisible). The whole operation needs to be done atomically.
When not part of a union/overlay, the whiteout appears as a character device with a {0,0} device number. (Note that other union/overlay implementations may employ different methods for storing whiteout entries; specifically, BSD union mount employs a separate inode type, DT_WHT, which, while supported by some filesystems available in Linux, such as CODA and XFS, is ignored by the kernel's whiteout support code, as of Linux 4.19, at least.)
RENAME_WHITEOUT requires the same privileges as creating a device node (i.e., the CAP_MKNOD capability).
RENAME_WHITEOUT can't be employed together with RENAME_EXCHANGE.
RENAME_WHITEOUT requires support from the underlying filesystem. Among the filesystems that support it are tmpfs (since Linux 3.18), ext4 (since Linux 3.18), XFS (since Linux 4.1), f2fs (since Linux 4.2), btrfs (since Linux 4.7), and ubifs (since Linux 4.9).
On success, zero is returned. On error, -1 is returned, and
errno
is set to indicate the error.
Write permission is denied for the directory containing
oldpath
or newpath
, or, search permission is denied
for one of the directories in the path prefix of oldpath
or
newpath
, or oldpath
is a directory and does not allow
write permission (needed to update the ..
entry). (See also
path_resolution(7).)
The rename fails because oldpath
or newpath
is a
directory that is in use by some process (perhaps as current working
directory, or as root directory, or because it was open for reading) or
is in use by the system (for example as a mount point), while the system
considers this an error. (Note that there is no requirement to return
EBUSY in such cases—there is nothing wrong with doing
the rename anyway—but it is allowed to return EBUSY if
the system cannot otherwise handle such situations.)
The user's quota of disk blocks on the filesystem has been exhausted.
oldpath
or newpath
points outside your accessible
address space.
The new pathname contained a path prefix of the old, or, more generally, an attempt was made to make a directory a subdirectory of itself.
newpath
is an existing directory, but oldpath
is
not a directory.
Too many symbolic links were encountered in resolving
oldpath
or newpath
.
oldpath
already has the maximum number of links to it, or it
was a directory and the directory containing newpath
has the
maximum number of links.
oldpath
or newpath
was too long.
The link named by oldpath
does not exist; or, a directory
component in newpath
does not exist; or, oldpath
or
newpath
is an empty string.
Insufficient kernel memory was available.
The device containing the file has no room for the new directory entry.
A component used as a directory in oldpath
or
newpath
is not, in fact, a directory. Or, oldpath
is a
directory, and newpath
exists but is not a directory.
newpath
is a nonempty directory, that is, contains entries
other than "." and "..".
The directory containing oldpath
has the sticky bit
(S_ISVTX) set and the process's effective user ID is
neither the user ID of the file to be deleted nor that of the directory
containing it, and the process is not privileged (Linux: does not have
the CAP_FOWNER capability); or newpath
is an
existing file and the directory containing it has the sticky bit set and
the process's effective user ID is neither the user ID of the file to be
replaced nor that of the directory containing it, and the process is not
privileged (Linux: does not have the CAP_FOWNER
capability); or the filesystem containing oldpath
does not
support renaming of the type requested.
The file is on a read-only filesystem.
oldpath
and newpath
are not on the same mounted
filesystem. (Linux permits a filesystem to be mounted at multiple
points, but rename() does not work across different
mount points, even if the same filesystem is mounted on both.)
The following additional errors can occur for renameat() and renameat2():
oldpath
(newpath
) is relative but olddirfd
(newdirfd
) is not a valid file descriptor.
oldpath
is relative and olddirfd
is a file
descriptor referring to a file other than a directory; or similar for
newpath
and newdirfd
The following additional errors can occur for renameat2():
flags
contains RENAME_NOREPLACE and
newpath
already exists.
An invalid flag was specified in flags
.
Both RENAME_NOREPLACE and
RENAME_EXCHANGE were specified in flags
.
Both RENAME_WHITEOUT and
RENAME_EXCHANGE were specified in flags
.
The filesystem does not support one of the flags in
flags
.
flags
contains RENAME_EXCHANGE and
newpath
does not exist.
RENAME_WHITEOUT was specified in flags
, but
the caller does not have the CAP_MKNOD capability.
4.3BSD, C89, POSIX.1-2001.
Linux 2.6.16, glibc 2.4.
Linux 3.15, glibc 2.28.
On older kernels where renameat() is unavailable,
the glibc wrapper function falls back to the use of
rename(). When oldpath
and newpath
are relative pathnames, glibc constructs pathnames based on the symbolic
links in /proc/self/fd
that correspond to the olddirfd
and newdirfd
arguments.
On NFS filesystems, you can not assume that if the operation failed, the file was not renamed. If the server does the rename operation and then crashes, the retransmitted RPC which will be processed when the server is up again causes a failure. The application is expected to deal with this. See link(2) for a similar problem.